For me, everything is philosophy, everything we do is philosophy, philosophy would exist with or without us, it's just more practical with us, and philosophy lies beneath everything we do. but which phrase would this description fit?

no I think what I'm trying to say is, philosophy is everything, but life isn't everything — philosophy is based on the entire universe, and life is just one star or one planet.

philosophy is in everything, philosophy is this big box that can fit anything, even life, but life is a smaller box which can't fit inside the big box, but we can fit the small box in the big one if you know what I mean.

this is such a paradox because without life, philosophy wouldn't have ever existed, but it still would've existed because it doesn't need life to fuel it, but at the same time it really does, because if people like me didn't think or exist philosophy would be the small box instead of the big one which contradicts both statements.

these two statements can actually co-exist simultaneously, which makes it that much more frustrating — and I hate paradoxes, but without paradoxes philosophy wouldn't exist, so I hate and love paradoxes.